HobbiesHobby ForumHobby WikiHobby Blogs
Zealot Hobby Forum

Go Back   Zealot Hobby Forum > The Gauge - Model Trains > Model Railroading > G / O / S Scale Model Trains



View Poll Results: what o gauge track do you like best
027 tube 10 35.71%
fast track 6 21.43%
gargraves 12 42.86%
Voters: 28. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-06-2008, 06:15 PM   #61 (permalink)
ozzy
Senior Member
 
ozzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: milton iowa
Posts: 1,115
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by riverotter View Post
What an interesting idea - thank you! It got me thinking that I also would want to run HO trains continuously, so I would still need two levels making a full circuit around the walls. Then I recalled from reading about David Barrow's 'dominoes' that I could build the (lower) HO level using 18" wide hollow-core doors, make them 40"-42" high, and position them slightly away from the walls so the angled braces from the upper level weren't an issue.

Again, I really appreciate everybody's comments and suggestions -- keep 'em coming!
make the HO a dog bone, then you can run continuously,

or if you have the O-scale drop under the HO, then put a 3rd level up, one above the HO.. then put an helix at each end for HO.

or.........

if the O drops under the HO then you can also run the HO off the end of the HO layout and drop the HO under the O scale . to take the HO all around the rest of the room kinda hidden. that way if you have a double mainline in HO one line the train will alway go across the ho layout from left to right, and the other line from right to left. so you never see the same train go across the layout in both directions, make it so that when the HO leaves the layout that its going to an imagery far off place, and it can come back on from the other side from an imagery place.
__________________
PATRIOT GUARD RIDERS MEMBER
CANCER SURVIVOR
ABATE MEMBER
AMA MEMBER
O- SCALER
N-SCALER
ozzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2008, 12:18 PM   #62 (permalink)
brakie
The Gauge Moderator
The Gauge Moderator
 
brakie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bucyrus,Ohio
Posts: 3,808
Default

To my mind Gargraves makes the best looking 3 rail track.Of course the Atlas 3 rail track doesn't look that bad either.

Not bad a "wee scaler "huh?
__________________
Larry.
Columbus & Hocking Valley Ry.
Serving the Industries of the Hocking Valley.
brakie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2008, 12:40 PM   #63 (permalink)
riverotter
Midwest Alliance Rail Sys
 
riverotter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Near Kansas City, MO
Posts: 229
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by brakie View Post
To my mind Gargraves makes the best looking 3 rail track.
I agree with you about Gargraves for 3-rail track. I think it also looks good for S gauge hi-rail.

However, since I started with 2-rail American Flyer trains as a kid before moving on to HO, that 3rd rail, no matter how manufacturers try to disguise it, still bothers me. That's why I've chosen 2-rail O scale. But de gustibus non est disputandum.

(Personally, I think the American education system started going downhill when they stopped requiring kids to learn at least some Latin.)
riverotter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2008, 12:53 PM   #64 (permalink)
Geno
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Castaic, CA
Posts: 303
Default

Quote:
that 3rd rail, no matter how manufacturers try to disguise it, still bothers me. That's why I've chosen 2-rail O scale

Same here- that's why I'm using stud rail.


Geno
Geno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2008, 12:57 PM   #65 (permalink)
riverotter
Midwest Alliance Rail Sys
 
riverotter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Near Kansas City, MO
Posts: 229
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Geno View Post
Same here- that's why I'm using stud rail. Geno
That does look pretty good. How does it perform when you ballast the track (enough to disguise, but not bury, the studs?)
riverotter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2008, 01:16 PM   #66 (permalink)
ozzy
Senior Member
 
ozzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: milton iowa
Posts: 1,115
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by riverotter View Post
I agree with you about Gargraves for 3-rail track. I think it also looks good for S gauge hi-rail.

However, since I started with 2-rail American Flyer trains as a kid before moving on to HO, that 3rd rail, no matter how manufacturers try to disguise it, still bothers me. That's why I've chosen 2-rail O scale. But de gustibus non est disputandum.

(Personally, I think the American education system started going downhill when they stopped requiring kids to learn at least some Latin.)

WHAT!?! your a 2 rail O scaler? if id of known that i would not of helped ya...

TEASING!!!!!!!!

but i think o-scale looks goofy without the 3rd rail.....lol but i started with 3. and less wiring with 3.
__________________
PATRIOT GUARD RIDERS MEMBER
CANCER SURVIVOR
ABATE MEMBER
AMA MEMBER
O- SCALER
N-SCALER
ozzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2008, 02:09 PM   #67 (permalink)
Geno
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Castaic, CA
Posts: 303
Default

riverotter,
I will let you know when I get that far- so far all I've done is mock up an oval of studrail with the cork roadbed temporarily glued down and the studrail in place. It works, but some 3-rail equipment has flanges that are too tall for the code 148 track (need to replace wheelsets).
You can hear the slider shoe contacting the studrail a little when the sound is off, but it isn't even noticeable once you have the engine sounds on.

I don't think the ballast will interfere with the slider shoes picking up current from the studrail, provided it's low and level enough.

Geno

Last edited by Geno; 01-07-2008 at 07:11 PM.
Geno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2008, 07:16 PM   #68 (permalink)
riverotter
Midwest Alliance Rail Sys
 
riverotter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Near Kansas City, MO
Posts: 229
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ozzy View Post
1. 027 tube
2. fast track
3. gargraves
Actually, none of the above is O scale track...

I model in O scale 2-rail and I use Atlas track - not perfect by a long shot.

EDIT: lest I sound too 'curmudgeony' or 'holier-than-thou' above, please let me note that today I picked up a copy of "O Gauge Railroading" and I'm really enjoying it!

Last edited by riverotter; 05-07-2008 at 08:29 PM.
riverotter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2008, 03:31 PM   #69 (permalink)
Spawn of Chaos
UP Big Boy Fanatic
 
Spawn of Chaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Seattle, Washington
Posts: 313
Default

I chose GarGraves simply because everyone tells me that is the best (including my LHS, which has a large O-scale layout in the back room so they can sell Lionel stuff ).
Spawn of Chaos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2008, 07:05 PM   #70 (permalink)
Geno
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Castaic, CA
Posts: 303
Default

I actually used to use Gargraves on my temporary floor layouts- it's very smooth running track, as well as being priced below Atlas and Lionel. The wood ties, despite being oversized, still give this track system a realistic appearance for 3-rail track. I still have quite a bit of it stored away- no idea what I'm going to do with it.

Geno
Geno is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
HO SCALE Track Planner TruckLover General Talk 2 05-22-2006 05:54 PM
G scale track help CSX G / O / S Scale Model Trains 20 02-20-2006 09:57 PM
G scale track - What's good? CSX G / O / S Scale Model Trains 6 09-24-2005 03:44 PM
Outdoor G-scale track CSX Technical Q & A 9 09-21-2005 05:48 PM
N Scale Track Ballasting jland31 Technical Q & A 9 07-05-2002 02:41 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:44 PM.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.