|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#31 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cincinnati, O.
Posts: 1,255
|
As for the note on wooden cars...
It would depend on the train and the caboose. Cabooses had trussrods just like other cars to transfer the force from coupler to coupler...so it would probably be fine in the era that the car was designed for...but an 1880's caboose with 2 truss rods would be flattened by a pair of 2-10-2s and a coal drag. Most of the dangers with wooden cars were telescoping accidents...odds are good the crew would set the caboose off rather than push it. Some wooden cabooses served into the 1960s. Also, the flagman would be riding the caboose...and he would set up to protect the train from getting plowed into by anything else on the main. The engineer would give 5 short wistle blasts to recall him (IIRC). The flagman was probably the most important member of the train crew...he kept the train from getting rear-ended by an unsuspecting train on the main....which could lead the dreaded telescoping.
__________________
My favorite engine My favorite RRs: the Denver, South Park, and Pacific The New York, Chicago, and St. Louis Railroad My Current Passenger Project My current freight car project |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Gibsonia, Pa.
Posts: 109
|
Larry, didn't Kaydee advertise a variant of this - uncouple/seperate/shove - for their "Delayed - Action" magne-matics? Just have to shove a little harder, and be sure the air is bled out ! Bob C.
__________________
James Thurber - "It is better to know some of the questions than all of the answers." |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 (permalink) | |
|
The Gauge Moderator
The Gauge Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bucyrus,Ohio
Posts: 3,809
|
Quote:
#309 is the under the track electric delayed uncoupler while the #321 is the between the rails delayed uncoupler. Like you said,uncouple,sperate and shove. Kadee® Quality Products Co. - Sample Prices
__________________
Larry. Columbus & Hocking Valley Ry. Serving the Industries of the Hocking Valley. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,000
|
I'm contemplating on how to accomplish this on my layout. I think using some sort of stiff bristle brushes, attached to a switch machine for an actuator might work out swell. The brushes being in or out depending on how far the car needs to roll.
__________________
Josh Models: http://rr.blockchoice.com | My Videos: http://youtube.com/user/jbaakko
Model Railroad Tips: http://www.modelrailroadtips.com Custom paint services, & Hobby shop: http://www.blockchoice.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 (permalink) | |
|
The Gauge Moderator
The Gauge Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bucyrus,Ohio
Posts: 3,809
|
Quote:
Actually it takes a 2 men on the ground..One to make the uncoupling and the other to throw the switch. Of course having three man is better..One to make the uncoupling,one to throw the switch and one to ride the car so the hand brake can be applied as needed.
__________________
Larry. Columbus & Hocking Valley Ry. Serving the Industries of the Hocking Valley. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Delaware
Posts: 817
|
For what it is worth. This was not an idea it was a practice. it was mid 70s when I was told about what they used to do. I would say 60s at the latest. I don't know if it was a legal move or how safe it was I just know he described it to me and I have told you about it to best of my memory.it was comman practice at this location and time.
Les Last edited by lester perry; 11-17-2007 at 08:27 PM. Reason: spelling |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 (permalink) |
|
The Gauge Moderator
The Gauge Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bucyrus,Ohio
Posts: 3,809
|
Lester,I was first taught how to execute the flying switch when I worked on the PRR..Then when I worked on the C&O under the Chessie banner we would use a flying switch as a last resort switch move..Under the CSX banner it was frown upon.
Here's another type of flying switch.. YouTube - CSX Y111 6-11-07
__________________
Larry. Columbus & Hocking Valley Ry. Serving the Industries of the Hocking Valley. |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 (permalink) |
|
Pooh Bah
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Brampton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,952
|
There are 2 operations that we may be talking about here. The video shows kicking cars, which is the simple form; just shove the cars and let go.
There is also what used to be called a "Dutch drop" (back when the dutch were blamed for everything) where the car is pulled, then uncoupled. The loco speeds up past the switch and the points are thrown before the car gets there. The dutch drop was used where there was a facing point switch and the car was on the wrong end. I think it is illegal and is certainly discouraged by the railroads, as a small miscalculation can result in the loose car running into the loco or not heading the right way at the switch.
__________________
David NMRA #010887; NARA #79 Perth & Exeter Railway Company Esquesing & Chinguacousy Radial Railway |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 (permalink) | |
|
The Gauge Moderator
The Gauge Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bucyrus,Ohio
Posts: 3,809
|
Quote:
Actually David,a "Dutch drop" is another term for "flying switch". Kicking cars is a form of flat switching where you "kick" the cars rather then shove the cars to a coupling..The crew uncouples the car while in motion and lets the car roll to a coupling. As the video shows a flying switch is not a illegal move.
__________________
Larry. Columbus & Hocking Valley Ry. Serving the Industries of the Hocking Valley. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Work SCHENLEY, PA HOME E Palestine, Ohio
Posts: 768
|
Here is a video I took of a 2 man crew doing a flying switch. I mean 2 man as the engineer and conductor only. They make it look easy.
YouTube - FLYING SWITCH Charlie |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 (permalink) | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Guelph, ON
Posts: 42
|
Quote:
EDIT: I didn't see brakie's posted video before posting. Pretty much exactly the same.
__________________
Chris van der Heide Guelph, ON. Last edited by acsoosub; 04-11-2008 at 09:44 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Chicago Burbs
Posts: 378
|
Quote:
About the shoving the caboose, I think there is some confusion because in some circumstances, mostly with helper service, the engine would be cut in front of the caboose.
__________________
The winds of change are blowing again... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 (permalink) | |
|
The Gauge Moderator
The Gauge Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bucyrus,Ohio
Posts: 3,809
|
Quote:
We would shove against the caboose when making a facing point set out. Also IF the caboose had a steel underframe the the pusher could shove against the caboose.
__________________
Larry. Columbus & Hocking Valley Ry. Serving the Industries of the Hocking Valley. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Trailing Point Spurs and the Crew | Gary S. | Model Rail Operations | 16 | 11-12-2007 04:25 PM |
| hinge point vs. solid point turnouts | DarkWingDuck | Technical Q & A | 4 | 08-19-2006 02:38 PM |
| Coal unit train point to point? | DOUBLEJK | Track Planning | 22 | 02-10-2006 11:02 PM |
| Update: My logging Point - Point layout | UPJunkie | Track Planning | 5 | 01-25-2005 07:56 AM |
| Brick, rock, stone and timber facing | Woodie | Technical Q & A | 6 | 05-30-2001 09:02 AM |