|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cincinnati, O.
Posts: 1,255
|
After laying around 11' of mainline over the past 10 months...I decided that it was to get serious about having a layout (rather than just the equipment. My track plan is a basic oval with a 28" minimum radius. I have one siding, a future wye, and a future passing siding.
Half of the mainline is/will be on cork roadbed...half direct on the foam board. One of the curves will have tie plates. My intention is to build 24" tall benchwork with storage space underneath...and then cut out the right of way and add mountains, streams, etc... The track laying procedure is: Glue down ties...lay many books on top of them as they dry...then sand...then add rail. The previous method was to glue down the cork roadbed...pile on the books...then glue down the ties...pile on the books...sand the ties...paint the ties...paint the rail...spike the rail down. I use both spiking tools and needle nose pliers. I have a rotary tool to speed up the turnout making process. I use HO flex track to assist me in laying out the ties.
__________________
My favorite engine My favorite RRs: the Denver, South Park, and Pacific The New York, Chicago, and St. Louis Railroad My Current Passenger Project My current freight car project |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,564
|
A few questions and comments:
1) your cat looks like my cat 2) I see you are laying the ties directly on foam, and then are spiking the rail. Does the rail hold adequately with spiking into just the ties? I am asuming the foam is rigid enough that it has no "give" when you press a spike in. I am considering laying my own rail, but was told that homasote under the ties is a must. Unfortunately, I can't find homasote anywhere around here (or foam for that matter). My plan is to use standard plywood subroadbed, and then luann plywood roadbed. 3) be sure to not take up *all* the space in that room, cause it looks like you have other stuff that need storage! Kevin |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cincinnati, O.
Posts: 1,255
|
My trusty assistants Pumpkin(Mr. Pumpers) & Chester. I think they ate the track gang...since we can see their handcar (which is a working model) abandoned next the incomplete stub switch.
In the next picture...it is obvious that the grading crew came through. Then there is a nice picture contrasting the size of HOn3 and On3. That's my HOn3 mainline...all 3' of it...which isn't long enough to hold my entire HOn3 roster. Beyond that is my dad's old On3 mainline...24" long. The corner closest to the stairs will be a trestle...but for now it is just widely spaced ties. And the final picture shows the nearly completed 3-way stub switch...with the temporarily soldered jumpers in place. The roster includes: 1 - Balboa brass DSP&P Cooke Mogul 1 - Spectrum Mogul converted to On3 with a Bear Trap stack added 1 - Grandt Line porter 1 - Precision Craft Galloping Goose in the 1950's tourist configuration 1 - Mainline Models 30' boxcar lettered for the South Park after the 1885 renumbering 1 - Model Masterpieces C&S steel underframe flat car 1 - Grandt Line D&RGW 700 series drop bottom gondola 2 - Grandt Line C&S stock cars 1 - brass C&S caboose 1 - Hallmark brass C&S business car 1 - Bachmann baggage car with 36" gauge wheels Near future additions: 1 - scratch built DSP&P boxcar...needs couplers 1 - scratch built DSP&P waycar (caboose)...needs couplers and some additional details 1 - nearly completed Grandt Line C&S caboose 1 - Bachmann flat car which is awaiting trucks and raising the couplers 1 - Bachmann boxcar in the same state as the flat car 1 - scratch built ex-Kansas Central/DL&G 27' boxcar which is 50% complete 1 - partially completed DSP&P paycar...the frame is ready to roll...it just needs couplers. The body is awaiting my building of the ends. I have a DSP&P Gunnison depot kit and a C&S Forks Creek station kit for the structures category. Power is currently provided by an MRC Tech 4 220...or an MRC Command 2000 with the power from the 220.
__________________
My favorite engine My favorite RRs: the Denver, South Park, and Pacific The New York, Chicago, and St. Louis Railroad My Current Passenger Project My current freight car project |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cincinnati, O.
Posts: 1,255
|
Quote:
The foam is an experiment...and I'm going to go back to cork roadbed in the future. It did give sometimes while spiking...but it didn't cause a problem except at the turnouts. I personally think that cork roadbed is ideal for driving spikes into...and I'd never again consider using plywood or particle board directly under the ties...made those terrible mistakes before...as well as laying my HOn3 into pine...all 3 required pre-drilling the holes. I really loved ties-on-cork-on foam. Homasote is a lumber yard material...I get my foam from Lowes or Home Depot. I'm hoping for nice Lowes/Home Depot gift cards to buy material to elevate the layout and have storage for everything but my guitar rack and Marshal half stack under the layout. Which cat is closer yours? Chester...the buff cat whom kills squirrels...attacks people whom don't let him outside for a week...and loves people to death for doing anything nice to him...or Pumpers...the tiger and mouse eater. Both prefer Loksound to no sound.
__________________
My favorite engine My favorite RRs: the Denver, South Park, and Pacific The New York, Chicago, and St. Louis Railroad My Current Passenger Project My current freight car project Last edited by nkp174; 11-20-2007 at 10:08 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Call me Mr.Tinkertrain
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cincinnati,Ohio
Posts: 1,369
|
great progress there man! that handlayed track is gonna look great
.keep up the good work and pics
__________________
i am a man,but i can change,if i have to...i guess--Red Green josh waddle--Avid/insane C&O modeler... |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cincinnati, O.
Posts: 1,255
|
bigsteel, it depends on your tools. Of course...you could save enough money to purchase...$300-$800 worth of tools dependent upon what turnouts you were going to purchase. I would highly recommend experimenting with it as it is definitely doable...and could save you enough to add a Precision Scale brass C&O L-1 hudson.
My 3-way stub switch was a nightmare...I'm going to use PC ties and solder the next time I do something like that. The wye turnout was also a pain since it has two curves. The older stub switch was no sweat and my previous turnout experiences were also easier. Stub switches are definitely easier than point switches...which is what you would need to build...but that's because the only part that requires any work is the frog. I've had success with both in the past. I also made it more difficult by not having cork under those two turnouts. If you print out some templates...you should have no problem building 40 nice turnouts on the cheap.
__________________
My favorite engine My favorite RRs: the Denver, South Park, and Pacific The New York, Chicago, and St. Louis Railroad My Current Passenger Project My current freight car project |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
multiscale modelbuilder
The Gauge Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Vernon Hills, Illinois
Posts: 4,176
|
Quote:
Keep posting on this project, it will help others. Pete |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cincinnati, O.
Posts: 1,255
|
Waffles is a narrow gauger too. I'm sitting here on my dad's couch pouring through his narrow gauge books and I saw that F&CC equipment ended up on the Margma Arizona.
Learning from mistakes is definitely less fun than learning from the forum! But some mistakes just need to be made.
__________________
My favorite engine My favorite RRs: the Denver, South Park, and Pacific The New York, Chicago, and St. Louis Railroad My Current Passenger Project My current freight car project |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,564
|
Yes. They bought a few box cars, and converted a few of them to flats. There are a few photos of them in Chappel's "rails to cary copper". Crud, that reminds me I need to find that book at the library so I can scan the drawing of #4 in the back!!
Kevin |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cincinnati, O.
Posts: 1,255
|
Quote:
Speaking of experimenting, Sumpter, I've asked for copies of Coronado's F&CC link & pins along with their DSP&P l&ps...to see how they mate. The DSP&P I intend to make my primary couplers...but with a slightly different method of coupling. I've also experimented with On3 Kadees, HO Kadees, and Precision scale knuckles for modern equipment...next up will then be one of San Juan's.
__________________
My favorite engine My favorite RRs: the Denver, South Park, and Pacific The New York, Chicago, and St. Louis Railroad My Current Passenger Project My current freight car project |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
multiscale modelbuilder
The Gauge Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Vernon Hills, Illinois
Posts: 4,176
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cincinnati, O.
Posts: 1,255
|
The Bachmann mogul's tender actually sits too low...and raising it the proper height corrected the coupler height.
__________________
My favorite engine My favorite RRs: the Denver, South Park, and Pacific The New York, Chicago, and St. Louis Railroad My Current Passenger Project My current freight car project |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
multiscale modelbuilder
The Gauge Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Vernon Hills, Illinois
Posts: 4,176
|
Quote:
As to the mogul's tender sitting too low.... the tender deck, and the cab floor, should be the same height, as the fireman has to step from one to the other, in the process of firing the locomotive, and in the case of the mogul, would most likely be standing on the tender deck when actually scooping coal. (the firebox door is only one foot from the back of the cab which accounts for the 3' foredeck on the tender). In retrospect, the 18" coupler height is probably the most correct for 30" gauge equipment, and no corrections need to be made. I chose the 24" height for two reasons aesthetics, and the parent company is 3' gauge.
__________________
We learn far more from our mistakes, than we will ever learn from another's "advice". http://www.lcmrr.org http://www.gclaser.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cincinnati, O.
Posts: 1,255
|
I raised mine with the addition of a pair of PSC trucks and maybe a thin washer or two. It couples nicely with my On3 equipment and the fireman can step forward to press the button that opens the butterfly doors. I love steam engines. So much fun!
Sumpter, do you have a thread with your layout somewhere?
__________________
My favorite engine My favorite RRs: the Denver, South Park, and Pacific The New York, Chicago, and St. Louis Railroad My Current Passenger Project My current freight car project |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| suggestions on a layout-within-a-layout | Santa Fe Jack | HO Scale Model Trains | 3 | 07-22-2006 11:19 AM |
| New UP Layout | Auzze | N / Z Scale Model Trains | 9 | 08-29-2005 11:50 AM |
| Small N scale layout or table layout | Pmagall | Track Planning | 14 | 01-29-2003 01:10 PM |
| Suggestions for my layout 1st layout? | Derrick W Garrett | Track Planning | 9 | 12-17-2002 02:53 PM |
| Scaling from and HO layout to an N layout | woowoo | N / Z Scale Model Trains | 4 | 01-01-2002 08:03 PM |