|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,586
|
As promised, here is a very crude trackplan for my proposed new layout. It's a 4x8 with both standard and narrow gauge track. The lower oval is standard and dual-gauge. A narrow gauge branch makes a loop and a half before reaching the mining town at the summit. All curves are 18" radius. For the length/type of equipment I am running, this should pose no problems. I plan on handlaying most of the track.
My goals for this trackplan were to depict the Morenci Southern railroad about 1917-1920. The prototype was very steep and winding with many trestles and bridges. The prototype ran between Morenci and Duncan, Arizona. Here is the plan, I will write more of my ideas later. Kevin |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Elks Plain, Washington
Posts: 1,479
|
I like that track plan. There's a lot going on in a small area.
Do you actually plan on tunneling all the curves and just have the center open? Interesting idea. Loren
__________________
You can't help getting older, but you don't have to get old. George Burns |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Ditat Deus
The Gauge Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 2,064
|
Now that's a layout it looks like my mudhen could visit!
__________________
TrainNut's layout index page |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,586
|
Yes, all the ends will be in tunnels, and the center town will be on top of the "mountain".
My philosophy is this: I want a railroad that looks like it goes somewhere, but I have limited space and an around-the-walls layout is not practical in the room that I have because of windows and doors. With this trackplan, I am representing the entire narrow gauge line as it climbs from the standard gauge interchange to the mining camp that it services. I also wanted a standard gauge loop that allows me to run the standard gauge equipment that I have. It would be fun to have a train running around the loop while I switch the upper town. Since this is a crude drawing, I'm not sure if the track arrangement in the town is feasable. I plan on fooling around with some track planning software - except I have a Mac and all the free stuff only works on a PC ![]() Kevin |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Out in the sticks
Posts: 1,392
|
That is a really cool plan. I love the tight curves, and all the opportunities for tunnels, bridges and the like. Just wondering if you have left enough room for buildings...looks like it from here. Also wondering how sharp your narrow gauge curves are, as it would be great if you could run one of those new Blackstone (MMI) K-27s on the NG line.
__________________
-Steve Hudson- -Edmonton, Alberta, Canada- -NARA Member # 74- http://www.stopstart.fsnet.co.uk/smilie/stupid.gif Megill River System "The Seven Bridges Road" Here's Me! |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,586
|
Here are a few pics of the prototype I am trying to represent:
Click on the thumbnails to enlarge the photos. These photos came from a webshots album that has dozens of old morenci photos: Old Morenci - Remember When... pictures from history photos on webshots As you can see, the town was very cluttered and steep, with buildings built wherever they could. In fact, there werent many streets - many places had to be accessed only by footpath or by mule. I would like my town to have a similar feel to it - so finding places for buildings is not an issue. i will squeeze them in wherever they will fit! I would like to find room for some kind of smelter, but I don't know how I could do that given my available space. The curves are all 18" minimum. I am told that the Blackstone K-27 has no issues with curves of that size or #4 turnouts. In fact, that is why I set my minimum at 18". Kevin |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Rail Spiking Fool!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 815
|
That is going to look pretty sweet when you are done. On a 4 x 8 table its also going to look really busy. Is this the one you are going to handlay?
__________________
"Life is not a journey to the grave with intentions of arriving safely in a pretty well-preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out and loudly proclaiming... WOW! What a ride!" -Anonymous- My Layout Progress. http://forum.zealot.com/t115665/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 991
|
A very nice plan and concept. If you can find a couple of extra inches, I would add a "hidden" passing siding for a staging track on the standard gauge - perhaps on one of the ends. That way you could stage a standard gauge train in each direction, or one passenger and one freight.
I had a similar concept for a 46" x 60" layout I had developed. The oval was standard gauge with a passing/staging siding on the back side. In the front was a single standard gauge spur leading to the freight transfer platform. The narrow gauge (HOn3) line had a small terminal (2 tracks) plus a spur to the other side of the freight transfer platform, and an engine house. The narrow gauge climbed inside the standard gauge around one end with a 15" radius to a switchback, whose tail crossed over the standard gauge at the far diagonal corner. The switchback led into a small "town" with several spurs and a runaround. Motive power was planned to be 2 Shays or 1 Shay and 1 Climax. May still build it yet, expanding to 4.5 x 7 ft. Anxiously waiting to see your progress. I am impressed.
__________________
Fred Wright Jack of All Trades for the Picture Gorge & Western Railway - none more picturesque Port Orford & Elk River Railway & Navigation Co - home of the tall cedars ...in foggy coastal Oregon where it's always 1900... |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | ||
|
multiscale modelbuilder
The Gauge Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Vernon Hills, Illinois
Posts: 4,206
|
Quote:
Quote:
Looks like this could be an interesting journey in creativity, hope all goes well! Pete |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cincinnati, O.
Posts: 1,261
|
I'm curious why your dual gauge ends without completing a a full loop. If I was you, I'd finish it up so that I could run either standard or narrow gauge trains continuously around the loop.
I love the basic design concept of an interchange and NG climbing a mountain.
__________________
My favorite engine My favorite RRs: the Denver, South Park, and Pacific The New York, Chicago, and St. Louis Railroad My Current Passenger Project My current freight car project |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,586
|
[quote=nkp174;772272]I'm curious why your dual gauge ends without completing a a full loop. If I was you, I'd finish it up so that I could run either standard or narrow gauge trains continuously around the loop.
hmm. good point! I think my original idea was to show the narrow gauge only as a branch, but after looking at the plan again, all of the non-dual standard gauge is in a tunnel anyway. I also wanted to keep the number of dual gauge switches to a minimum, because I am not sure how hard they are to build. Having a complete loop of dual gauge only requires one more dual gauge switch (as it is right now, one of the "switches" would really only be a separation track with no moving points) Kevin |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
It's not rocket surgery
The Gauge Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 6,668
|
I like the separation of the dual gauge/std gauge track. Seeing it end at an "interchange" gives a definite feeling that the narrow gauge branch is self-contained. The standard trackage goes off to the "rest of the world", leaving the narrow gauge line to itself...
Andrew
__________________
Check out The Gauge's Modular Layout Forum Questions? Visit The Academy at The Gauge for all kinds of How-To's Planning a layout? Try the Givens and Druthers form |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hamburg, NY
Posts: 23
|
Quote:
I use an iMac and just purchased "Empire Express" version 2.0 ... so far so good... if you haven't checked it out, a demo version can be downloaded from Empire Express 2.0 is now available | Haddon Software, it costs $34.99 to register it (demo version doesn't save or print). --Rob. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| SP in Texas track plan and operating plan, what do you think? | hubba90bubba | Track Planning | 5 | 06-01-2007 12:40 PM |
| HOn3 tie spacing on shinahara track | czwij | Narrow Gauge Model Railroading | 4 | 11-30-2004 02:22 AM |
| need help with track plan please! | trainsteve2435 | Track Planning | 6 | 06-21-2004 11:36 PM |
| New track plan | YakkoWarner | N / Z Scale Model Trains | 4 | 07-16-2003 01:18 PM |
| RLK&T Track Plan | TomPM | Track Planning | 6 | 01-18-2003 09:26 PM |