HobbiesHobby ForumHobby Blogs
Zealot Hobby Forum

Go Back   Zealot Hobby Forum > The Gauge - Model Trains > Model Railroading > Narrow Gauge Model Railroading



Support our community and these ads go away.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-28-2007, 07:20 PM   #1 (permalink)
nachoman
Senior Member
 
nachoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,586
Default New track plan for a 4x8 in HO/HOn3

As promised, here is a very crude trackplan for my proposed new layout. It's a 4x8 with both standard and narrow gauge track. The lower oval is standard and dual-gauge. A narrow gauge branch makes a loop and a half before reaching the mining town at the summit. All curves are 18" radius. For the length/type of equipment I am running, this should pose no problems. I plan on handlaying most of the track.

My goals for this trackplan were to depict the Morenci Southern railroad about 1917-1920. The prototype was very steep and winding with many trestles and bridges. The prototype ran between Morenci and Duncan, Arizona.

Here is the plan, I will write more of my ideas later.

Kevin
Attached Images
File Type: jpg MRR.jpg (44.2 KB, 41 views)
nachoman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2007, 07:51 PM   #2 (permalink)
Nomad
Senior Member
 
Nomad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Elks Plain, Washington
Posts: 1,479
Default

I like that track plan. There's a lot going on in a small area.
Do you actually plan on tunneling all the curves and just have the center open? Interesting idea.

Loren
__________________
You can't help getting older, but you don't have to get old.
George Burns
Nomad is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2007, 08:13 PM   #3 (permalink)
TrainNut
Ditat Deus
The Gauge Moderator
 
TrainNut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 2,064
Default

Now that's a layout it looks like my mudhen could visit!
__________________
TrainNut's layout index page
TrainNut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 12:02 AM   #4 (permalink)
nachoman
Senior Member
 
nachoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,586
Default

Yes, all the ends will be in tunnels, and the center town will be on top of the "mountain".

My philosophy is this: I want a railroad that looks like it goes somewhere, but I have limited space and an around-the-walls layout is not practical in the room that I have because of windows and doors. With this trackplan, I am representing the entire narrow gauge line as it climbs from the standard gauge interchange to the mining camp that it services. I also wanted a standard gauge loop that allows me to run the standard gauge equipment that I have. It would be fun to have a train running around the loop while I switch the upper town.

Since this is a crude drawing, I'm not sure if the track arrangement in the town is feasable. I plan on fooling around with some track planning software - except I have a Mac and all the free stuff only works on a PC

Kevin
nachoman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 12:55 PM   #5 (permalink)
Lighthorseman
Senior Member
 
Lighthorseman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Out in the sticks
Posts: 1,392
Default

That is a really cool plan. I love the tight curves, and all the opportunities for tunnels, bridges and the like. Just wondering if you have left enough room for buildings...looks like it from here. Also wondering how sharp your narrow gauge curves are, as it would be great if you could run one of those new Blackstone (MMI) K-27s on the NG line.
__________________
-Steve Hudson-
-Edmonton, Alberta, Canada-
-NARA Member # 74-
http://www.stopstart.fsnet.co.uk/smilie/stupid.gif

Megill River System
"The Seven Bridges Road"


Here's Me!
Lighthorseman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 01:22 PM   #6 (permalink)
nachoman
Senior Member
 
nachoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,586
Default

Here are a few pics of the prototype I am trying to represent:





Click on the thumbnails to enlarge the photos. These photos came from a webshots album that has dozens of old morenci photos:

Old Morenci - Remember When... pictures from history photos on webshots

As you can see, the town was very cluttered and steep, with buildings built wherever they could. In fact, there werent many streets - many places had to be accessed only by footpath or by mule. I would like my town to have a similar feel to it - so finding places for buildings is not an issue. i will squeeze them in wherever they will fit! I would like to find room for some kind of smelter, but I don't know how I could do that given my available space.

The curves are all 18" minimum. I am told that the Blackstone K-27 has no issues with curves of that size or #4 turnouts. In fact, that is why I set my minimum at 18".

Kevin
nachoman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 02:22 PM   #7 (permalink)
tetters
Rail Spiking Fool!
 
tetters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 815
Default

That is going to look pretty sweet when you are done. On a 4 x 8 table its also going to look really busy. Is this the one you are going to handlay?
__________________
"Life is not a journey to the grave with intentions of arriving safely in a pretty well-preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out and loudly proclaiming...
WOW! What a ride!" -Anonymous-
My Layout Progress.
http://forum.zealot.com/t115665/
tetters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 03:19 PM   #8 (permalink)
pgandw
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 991
Default

A very nice plan and concept. If you can find a couple of extra inches, I would add a "hidden" passing siding for a staging track on the standard gauge - perhaps on one of the ends. That way you could stage a standard gauge train in each direction, or one passenger and one freight.

I had a similar concept for a 46" x 60" layout I had developed. The oval was standard gauge with a passing/staging siding on the back side. In the front was a single standard gauge spur leading to the freight transfer platform.

The narrow gauge (HOn3) line had a small terminal (2 tracks) plus a spur to the other side of the freight transfer platform, and an engine house. The narrow gauge climbed inside the standard gauge around one end with a 15" radius to a switchback, whose tail crossed over the standard gauge at the far diagonal corner. The switchback led into a small "town" with several spurs and a runaround.

Motive power was planned to be 2 Shays or 1 Shay and 1 Climax.

May still build it yet, expanding to 4.5 x 7 ft.

Anxiously waiting to see your progress. I am impressed.
__________________
Fred Wright
Jack of All Trades for the
Picture Gorge & Western Railway - none more picturesque
Port Orford & Elk River Railway & Navigation Co - home of the tall cedars

...in foggy coastal Oregon where it's always 1900...
pgandw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2007, 01:32 PM   #9 (permalink)
sumpter250
multiscale modelbuilder
The Gauge Moderator
 
sumpter250's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Vernon Hills, Illinois
Posts: 4,206
Default

Quote:
Also wondering how sharp your narrow gauge curves are, as it would be great if you could run one of those new Blackstone (MMI) K-27s on the NG line.
The stated radius of 18" should work. I have a brass K-27 that runs well on the 18" curves of the modules.
Quote:
I plan on fooling around with some track planning software - except I have a Mac and all the free stuff only works on a PC
I still like the track planning "software" that requires only a sharp pencil, a compass, a ruler, and as much paper as is needed.
Looks like this could be an interesting journey in creativity, hope all goes well!
Pete
sumpter250 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2007, 02:50 PM   #10 (permalink)
nkp174
Senior Member
 
nkp174's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cincinnati, O.
Posts: 1,261
Default

I'm curious why your dual gauge ends without completing a a full loop. If I was you, I'd finish it up so that I could run either standard or narrow gauge trains continuously around the loop.

I love the basic design concept of an interchange and NG climbing a mountain.
__________________
My favorite engine
My favorite RRs: the Denver, South Park, and Pacific
The New York, Chicago, and St. Louis Railroad
My Current Passenger Project
My current freight car project
nkp174 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2007, 03:25 PM   #11 (permalink)
nachoman
Senior Member
 
nachoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,586
Default

[quote=nkp174;772272]I'm curious why your dual gauge ends without completing a a full loop. If I was you, I'd finish it up so that I could run either standard or narrow gauge trains continuously around the loop.

hmm. good point! I think my original idea was to show the narrow gauge only as a branch, but after looking at the plan again, all of the non-dual standard gauge is in a tunnel anyway. I also wanted to keep the number of dual gauge switches to a minimum, because I am not sure how hard they are to build. Having a complete loop of dual gauge only requires one more dual gauge switch (as it is right now, one of the "switches" would really only be a separation track with no moving points)

Kevin
nachoman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2007, 03:59 PM   #12 (permalink)
MasonJar
It's not rocket surgery
The Gauge Moderator
 
MasonJar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 6,668
Default

I like the separation of the dual gauge/std gauge track. Seeing it end at an "interchange" gives a definite feeling that the narrow gauge branch is self-contained. The standard trackage goes off to the "rest of the world", leaving the narrow gauge line to itself...

Andrew
__________________
Check out The Gauge's Modular Layout Forum
Questions? Visit The Academy at The Gauge for all kinds of How-To's
Planning a layout? Try the Givens and Druthers form
MasonJar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2007, 12:21 PM   #13 (permalink)
modelsof1900
Senior Member
 
modelsof1900's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Dresden, Germany
Posts: 525
Default

Kevin,

nice idea for a HO/HOn3 track plan and good pictures for raelization. Wish succes and hope for more pictures in progress.

Bernhard
__________________
America railroad model building is fun.

To see all my albums click here, please.
modelsof1900 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2008, 04:03 PM   #14 (permalink)
WVM_Nut
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3
Default

Definitely will be an expensive little fella with all that dual gauge. Nice little plan though.
WVM_Nut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2008, 07:02 PM   #15 (permalink)
RobL
Junior Member
 
RobL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hamburg, NY
Posts: 23
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nachoman View Post
Since this is a crude drawing, I'm not sure if the track arrangement in the town is feasable. I plan on fooling around with some track planning software - except I have a Mac and all the free stuff only works on a PC

I use an iMac and just purchased "Empire Express" version 2.0 ... so far so good... if you haven't checked it out, a demo version can be downloaded from Empire Express 2.0 is now available | Haddon Software, it costs $34.99 to register it (demo version doesn't save or print).

--Rob.
RobL is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SP in Texas track plan and operating plan, what do you think? hubba90bubba Track Planning 5 06-01-2007 12:40 PM
HOn3 tie spacing on shinahara track czwij Narrow Gauge Model Railroading 4 11-30-2004 02:22 AM
need help with track plan please! trainsteve2435 Track Planning 6 06-21-2004 11:36 PM
New track plan YakkoWarner N / Z Scale Model Trains 4 07-16-2003 01:18 PM
RLK&T Track Plan TomPM Track Planning 6 01-18-2003 09:26 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Powered by vbWiki Pro 1.3 RC5. Copyright ©2006-2007, NuHit, LLC