HobbiesHobby ForumHobby Blogs
Zealot Hobby Forum

Go Back   Zealot Hobby Forum > The Gauge - Model Trains > Model Railroading > Logging, Mining and Industrial Railroads



Support our community and these ads go away.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-08-2008, 01:03 AM   #16 (permalink)
KentBy
GN, NP, SP&S
 
KentBy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Canby, Oregon
Posts: 74
Default Well now that I understand more about measuring.

I have retested my Heisler and converted to max percent grade without spinning the wheels.

Tested on straight track
Engine with zero cars.... 11.4
with one car....... 8.0
with two cars..... 5.9
with three cars... 4.9
with four cars..... 4.0
with five cars..... 3.3
with six cars...... 2.1
with seven cars.. 2.1
with eight cars... 2.1

Tested on 18" curve track
Engine with two cars..... 7.5
with four cars.... 5.1
with six cars...... 3.0
with seven cars.. 3.0
with eight cars... 3.0

Tested on 15" curve track
Engine with two cars........ 6.6
with six cars......... 2.6
with seven cars..... 2.6

With this testing I think that I can use 1 to 2 percent grade on curves and 2 to 3 percent on straight section.

I put the conversion for degrees to percent grade into excel to figure all this numbers out. Then I got to looking at my level and it has a button to convert to percent grade on it.

Kent
__________________
Kent Byerley
Canby, Oregon
KentBy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2008, 01:38 PM   #17 (permalink)
pgandw
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 991
Default

Results really look pretty good. Interesting that it does better on curves than on straight. Must be the extra friction the wheels are able to generate rubbing against the rail sides. I'm guessing that the track gauge on your straight track is the wide end of the NMRA tolerances. I wonder if straight track closer to the narrow end of the tolerances (ME flex track) would increase traction slightly. An experiment I'll have to try soon.

Thanks for the report.
__________________
Fred Wright
Jack of All Trades for the
Picture Gorge & Western Railway - none more picturesque
Port Orford & Elk River Railway & Navigation Co - home of the tall cedars

...in foggy coastal Oregon where it's always 1900...
pgandw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2008, 02:15 PM   #18 (permalink)
NIevo
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hayden, ID
Posts: 83
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pgandw View Post
Results really look pretty good. Interesting that it does better on curves than on straight. Must be the extra friction the wheels are able to generate rubbing against the rail sides. I'm guessing that the track gauge on your straight track is the wide end of the NMRA tolerances. I wonder if straight track closer to the narrow end of the tolerances (ME flex track) would increase traction slightly. An experiment I'll have to try soon.

Thanks for the report.
I think the testing for the curves was done on level track? Otherwise I think he would have listed the grade for the curved test.
NIevo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2008, 09:39 PM   #19 (permalink)
KentBy
GN, NP, SP&S
 
KentBy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Canby, Oregon
Posts: 74
Default Ok, here is my test setup.

On a 4x8 sheet of 1/2 plywood with 1/2 inch of foam on top. I setup an oval of sectional track with straight on the side and curved across the top and bottom. The first piece of curve track is 18" and all the other curves are 15".

I just check the track with my gauge and the 18" curve has some tight spots in it, but the straight and 15" pieces look OK.

Now for my testing I put blocks of wood under one end of the plywood and started out really high. Ran the test and measured the angles.
Keep in mind that the angle on the curved sections were measured with the level being parallel to the ends to that section and the thickness of the wood under the end is not guaranteed to be perfectly level, but the angle that I measured was at the place in the track that the engine was at. Another thing to keep in mind is that when the engine enters the curved track the cars are still in the straight track. I don't know how to judge that.

Another thing to keep in mind is that my blocks don't represent all possible angle. I didn't publish the numbers I got from "slips a little", "Slips some", "slips a lot" and "spins/stalled".

I have those numbers if you want to see them, but I thought that the only important one is the one without spinning the wheels.

Kent
__________________
Kent Byerley
Canby, Oregon
KentBy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2008, 12:51 PM   #20 (permalink)
Triplex
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,676
Default

Quote:
Also I will be doing some testing on how to make a engine turn-around at the top of my logging site, or should I just run the engine backwards on the return trip?
Geared engines could run equally fast (er... slow) in either direction. You don't need to turn it.
__________________
Fan of Conrail... also transition-era PRR, 70s Santa Fe, BN and SP, 70s-80s eastern CN, pre-merger-era UP, heavy electric operations in general, modern EFVM and Brazilian railroads in general... why bother trying to list them all?
Triplex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2008, 04:25 PM   #21 (permalink)
Jim Krause
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Polson, MT
Posts: 1,366
Default

Switchbacks and reverse running were the order of the day on most logging lines. Most logging operations didn't even have turntables. Maybe a wye somewhere if there was room enough. On steep grades, the loco's were usually operated with the front of the locomotive upgrade in order to keep water over the boiler crownsheet.
Jim Krause is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2008, 10:46 PM   #22 (permalink)
Mountain Man
Senior Member
 
Mountain Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 731
Default

Two quick thoughts:

1. Did you balance your engine? To much weight forward or aft will affect the tractive ability.

2. I think they make traction tires to help model locos "make the grade" Have you considered those?

Good luck with your layout.
__________________
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Who is watching the watchers?

When I told them I was going to stop raising hell, they all called me a quitter.
Mountain Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2008, 12:53 AM   #23 (permalink)
KentBy
GN, NP, SP&S
 
KentBy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Canby, Oregon
Posts: 74
Default No, No....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mountain Man View Post
Two quick thoughts:

1. Did you balance your engine? To much weight forward or aft will affect the tractive ability.
The Heisler is straight out of the box. I did 1/2 hour run in and then started testing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mountain Man View Post
2. I think they make traction tires to help model locos "make the grade" Have you considered those?

Good luck with your layout.
I would be wondering if I would loose electrical contact if I used rubber on any of my tires.

I could get out my file and convert it to a cogged line.

Kent
__________________
Kent Byerley
Canby, Oregon
KentBy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
logging cars on track grades eric halpin Logging, Mining and Industrial Railroads 6 11-19-2007 04:11 PM
Grades in G scale Bill_in_PDX G / O / S Scale Model Trains 8 04-26-2003 09:05 AM
Bridges on grades Jim de Bree Technical Q & A 16 07-13-2002 04:05 PM
grades Charliethecat Technical Q & A 4 01-21-2002 03:54 PM
Replacing grades billk Technical Q & A 1 10-16-2001 04:14 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Powered by vbWiki Pro 1.3 RC5. Copyright ©2006-2007, NuHit, LLC