|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
GN, NP, SP&S
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Canby, Oregon
Posts: 74
|
I have retested my Heisler and converted to max percent grade without spinning the wheels.
Tested on straight track Engine with zero cars.... 11.4 with one car....... 8.0 with two cars..... 5.9 with three cars... 4.9 with four cars..... 4.0 with five cars..... 3.3 with six cars...... 2.1 with seven cars.. 2.1 with eight cars... 2.1 Tested on 18" curve track Engine with two cars..... 7.5 with four cars.... 5.1 with six cars...... 3.0 with seven cars.. 3.0 with eight cars... 3.0 Tested on 15" curve track Engine with two cars........ 6.6 with six cars......... 2.6 with seven cars..... 2.6 With this testing I think that I can use 1 to 2 percent grade on curves and 2 to 3 percent on straight section. I put the conversion for degrees to percent grade into excel to figure all this numbers out. Then I got to looking at my level and it has a button to convert to percent grade on it. ![]() Kent
__________________
Kent Byerley Canby, Oregon |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 991
|
Results really look pretty good. Interesting that it does better on curves than on straight. Must be the extra friction the wheels are able to generate rubbing against the rail sides. I'm guessing that the track gauge on your straight track is the wide end of the NMRA tolerances. I wonder if straight track closer to the narrow end of the tolerances (ME flex track) would increase traction slightly. An experiment I'll have to try soon.
Thanks for the report.
__________________
Fred Wright Jack of All Trades for the Picture Gorge & Western Railway - none more picturesque Port Orford & Elk River Railway & Navigation Co - home of the tall cedars ...in foggy coastal Oregon where it's always 1900... |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hayden, ID
Posts: 83
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
GN, NP, SP&S
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Canby, Oregon
Posts: 74
|
On a 4x8 sheet of 1/2 plywood with 1/2 inch of foam on top. I setup an oval of sectional track with straight on the side and curved across the top and bottom. The first piece of curve track is 18" and all the other curves are 15".
I just check the track with my gauge and the 18" curve has some tight spots in it, but the straight and 15" pieces look OK. Now for my testing I put blocks of wood under one end of the plywood and started out really high. Ran the test and measured the angles. Keep in mind that the angle on the curved sections were measured with the level being parallel to the ends to that section and the thickness of the wood under the end is not guaranteed to be perfectly level, but the angle that I measured was at the place in the track that the engine was at. Another thing to keep in mind is that when the engine enters the curved track the cars are still in the straight track. I don't know how to judge that. Another thing to keep in mind is that my blocks don't represent all possible angle. I didn't publish the numbers I got from "slips a little", "Slips some", "slips a lot" and "spins/stalled". I have those numbers if you want to see them, but I thought that the only important one is the one without spinning the wheels. Kent
__________________
Kent Byerley Canby, Oregon |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,676
|
Quote:
__________________
Fan of Conrail... also transition-era PRR, 70s Santa Fe, BN and SP, 70s-80s eastern CN, pre-merger-era UP, heavy electric operations in general, modern EFVM and Brazilian railroads in general... why bother trying to list them all? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Polson, MT
Posts: 1,366
|
Switchbacks and reverse running were the order of the day on most logging lines. Most logging operations didn't even have turntables. Maybe a wye somewhere if there was room enough. On steep grades, the loco's were usually operated with the front of the locomotive upgrade in order to keep water over the boiler crownsheet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 731
|
Two quick thoughts:
1. Did you balance your engine? To much weight forward or aft will affect the tractive ability. 2. I think they make traction tires to help model locos "make the grade" Have you considered those? Good luck with your layout. ![]()
__________________
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? Who is watching the watchers? When I told them I was going to stop raising hell, they all called me a quitter. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 (permalink) | ||
|
GN, NP, SP&S
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Canby, Oregon
Posts: 74
|
Quote:
![]() Quote:
I could get out my file and convert it to a cogged line. ![]() Kent
__________________
Kent Byerley Canby, Oregon |
||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| logging cars on track grades | eric halpin | Logging, Mining and Industrial Railroads | 6 | 11-19-2007 04:11 PM |
| Grades in G scale | Bill_in_PDX | G / O / S Scale Model Trains | 8 | 04-26-2003 09:05 AM |
| Bridges on grades | Jim de Bree | Technical Q & A | 16 | 07-13-2002 04:05 PM |
| grades | Charliethecat | Technical Q & A | 4 | 01-21-2002 03:54 PM |
| Replacing grades | billk | Technical Q & A | 1 | 10-16-2001 04:14 PM |