HobbiesHobby ForumHobby WikiHobby Blogs
Zealot Hobby Forum

Go Back   Zealot Hobby Forum > The Gauge - Model Trains > Technical Info > Track Planning



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-16-2008, 02:26 PM   #1 (permalink)
brakie
The Gauge Moderator
The Gauge Moderator
 
brakie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bucyrus,Ohio
Posts: 3,808
Default Probable Layout.

Guys,I am thinking about building this 2x4 foot layout since I can easily set it up and take it down.I gotta find something to keep me occupied.





However I plan on making some changes.

1.Eliminate the bottom crossover crossover and both switches since they have no real reason to be there.

2.Cut the yard from 4 to 3 tracks.


3.Eliminate the engine service track and engine house


4.Use smaller industries and use 2 on each industrial track.


Improvements.
1.Use the bottom track as a interchange and run around.

After thought.
I could leave the bottom cross over and place a industry there.


Any thoughts/comments?
__________________
Larry.
Columbus & Hocking Valley Ry.
Serving the Industries of the Hocking Valley.
brakie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 03:44 PM   #2 (permalink)
Russ Bellinis
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lakewood, Ca.
Posts: 4,353
Default

It looks like a fun project that should provide quite a bit of switching operation to keep you busy after it is built.
Russ Bellinis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 04:15 PM   #3 (permalink)
riverotter
Midwest Alliance Rail Sys
 
riverotter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Near Kansas City, MO
Posts: 229
Default

I'm trying to envision what the track plan would look like if you eliminate the bottom crossover. Wouldn't that "strand" the lower segment of track?

Otherwise, it sounds like a good set of adjustments, especially using smaller industries and serving two per siding -- lots more "interesting situations" (re) spotting cars that way.

My only other comment right now would be that the passing track at the top of the plan seems very short...

I would be interested to see a revised track plan ... and of course, photos as things develop
riverotter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 04:21 PM   #4 (permalink)
Herc Driver
Senior Member
 
Herc Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,499
Default

Overall cool layout...I'd eliminate the lower right turnout that goes to no where as well. It would be hard to locate all the turnout mechanisms anyway and removing those turnouts would allow for scenery in that corner. I agree about removing a yard track, there doesn't seem to be a reason to have four, and removing one would free up space for an engine service area or even a trackside industry...IMHO. (I'd keep the engine house but that's only 'cause I like engines.)
__________________
Flying the Herc to pay for the trains!
Herc Driver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 07:23 PM   #5 (permalink)
steamhead
Senior Member
 
steamhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Brownsville, TX
Posts: 1,980
Default

That little layout will keep you busy for many operating sessions....And your mods, as well as the other suggestions offered, will make it better, and eliminate the "spagheti bowl" look.
Keep us posted on this new venture...!!!
__________________
Gus (LC&P).
steamhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 09:47 PM   #6 (permalink)
brakie
The Gauge Moderator
The Gauge Moderator
 
brakie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bucyrus,Ohio
Posts: 3,808
Default

riverotter,No..I plan on keeping the switch off the main line and adding another on the far in so I can have a run around/interchange track.That upper run around track bothers me as well..I would like it a tad longer.


Herc,As of now my thoughts is on a one horse short line.A local fuel dealer will refuel the locomotive and contract maintenance man cal repair or inspect the locomotive as needed..Any heavy repairs will be contracted out to a locomotive rebuilder or perhaps a regional railroad.


Russ,I also planned on adding detailed scenes..
__________________
Larry.
Columbus & Hocking Valley Ry.
Serving the Industries of the Hocking Valley.
brakie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2008, 03:35 AM   #7 (permalink)
Russ Bellinis
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lakewood, Ca.
Posts: 4,353
Default

Larry, it just occurred to me that if you built that layout just a tad wider than 2 feet add maybe 3-6 inches to the width, you could eliminate the short run around track to the inside of the top of the layout and add a much longer run around to the outside of the top. Since you are putting all of this layout in a 2 x 4 space, I'm presuming it is n scale.
Russ Bellinis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2008, 12:44 PM   #8 (permalink)
brakie
The Gauge Moderator
The Gauge Moderator
 
brakie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bucyrus,Ohio
Posts: 3,808
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ Bellinis View Post
Larry, it just occurred to me that if you built that layout just a tad wider than 2 feet add maybe 3-6 inches to the width, you could eliminate the short run around track to the inside of the top of the layout and add a much longer run around to the outside of the top. Since you are putting all of this layout in a 2 x 4 space, I'm presuming it is n scale.

Russ,First it is indeed N Scale..I wish I could add to the width..This morning I remeasure my storage area and *might* able to use a 2x5 footer.I could then extend the run around track and add a switch lead for the yard..I would need too rearrange all the industrial tracks though however,I like the overall design because it fits my needs.

First time in many years I am at a lost on what path to take as far as personalizing somebody else's design.
__________________
Larry.
Columbus & Hocking Valley Ry.
Serving the Industries of the Hocking Valley.
brakie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2008, 07:22 PM   #9 (permalink)
Russ Bellinis
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lakewood, Ca.
Posts: 4,353
Default

Larry, I don't know what is available in n-scale. If they have curved turnouts available, using a curved turnout in the top of each end of the oval would increase the length of the run around track at the top of the layout without increasing the size of the layout, and probably with very little if any adjustment needed in the industrial sidings.
Russ Bellinis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2008, 01:13 PM   #10 (permalink)
brakie
The Gauge Moderator
The Gauge Moderator
 
brakie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bucyrus,Ohio
Posts: 3,808
Default

Russ,Peco makes curve switches in N but,the curve radii is to large for that layout.I am sure he used the common "train set" style 9-3/4" radius curve.

I may have to go up to a 2x5' (maximum my storage space will allow)and use that layout as a base design which may be the better of the 2 evils.
__________________
Larry.
Columbus & Hocking Valley Ry.
Serving the Industries of the Hocking Valley.
brakie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2008, 06:07 PM   #11 (permalink)
Russ Bellinis
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lakewood, Ca.
Posts: 4,353
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by brakie View Post
Russ,Peco makes curve switches in N but,the curve radii is to large for that layout.I am sure he used the common "train set" style 9-3/4" radius curve.

I may have to go up to a 2x5' (maximum my storage space will allow)and use that layout as a base design which may be the better of the 2 evils.
Larry, I wonder if it would work to use the Peco curved turnouts as a sort of transition curve into tighter radius flex track to complete the curves? Often times a locomotive in ho which will require a minimum 22 inch radius will tolerate an 18 inch section in the middle of a 22 inch radius curve, but would derail if you tried to go through an entire 180 degree curve at an 18 inch radius.
Russ Bellinis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2008, 05:43 PM   #12 (permalink)
Squidbait
Recovering ALCO-holic
 
Squidbait's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Paris, ON
Posts: 878
Default

OK, ignore previous plan... 3x5! D'oh! So I can't multiply 12x2!

... and it was such a good plan, too!
__________________
Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.
Squidbait is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2008, 06:03 PM   #13 (permalink)
Squidbait
Recovering ALCO-holic
 
Squidbait's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Paris, ON
Posts: 878
Default

OK, let's try it again!

Here's the plan, stretched to 2x5. Same industrial area, lost the track off the bottom, but added a passing siding and yard lead.

*EDIT* I used 11" minimum curves and Peco medium turnouts.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg brakie2x5.jpg (75.3 KB, 4 views)
__________________
Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

Last edited by Squidbait; 05-21-2008 at 06:10 PM.
Squidbait is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2008, 06:08 PM   #14 (permalink)
Squidbait
Recovering ALCO-holic
 
Squidbait's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Paris, ON
Posts: 878
Default

Oh, BTW, any of the curved turnouts available in N scale that I've been able to find are pretty broad - too broad to be used to good effect on this layout.
__________________
Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.
Squidbait is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2008, 01:31 PM   #15 (permalink)
brakie
The Gauge Moderator
The Gauge Moderator
 
brakie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bucyrus,Ohio
Posts: 3,808
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Squidbait View Post
OK, let's try it again!

Here's the plan, stretched to 2x5. Same industrial area, lost the track off the bottom, but added a passing siding and yard lead.

*EDIT* I used 11" minimum curves and Peco medium turnouts.

L ike that plan..Its simple,got a switch lead,run around..All needed for my planned operations.

However I will need to add a interchange track because that will be the heart of the operation and *may* straighten the right side industrial tracks so I can add a small town area..

I even came up with a new 1 horse short line as well as doubling for a NS/C&HV branch line..

Funny thing that..I came up with a ops plan and short line but,was stuck on the track plan.
__________________
Larry.
Columbus & Hocking Valley Ry.
Serving the Industries of the Hocking Valley.
brakie is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
suggestions on a layout-within-a-layout Santa Fe Jack HO Scale Model Trains 3 07-22-2006 11:19 AM
Once Again! A Probable FAKE(?) 93-S on eBay! El Vigilante Archives 12 07-05-2005 10:45 PM
Please help with probable fake Roman denarius Mike Dworetsky Archives 0 04-19-2005 03:24 PM
Small N scale layout or table layout Pmagall Track Planning 14 01-29-2003 01:10 PM
Scaling from and HO layout to an N layout woowoo N / Z Scale Model Trains 4 01-01-2002 08:03 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:38 PM.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.